If an insurance company could be held liable for coverage of the damages that were caused by a given accident, then the same company would almost certainly employ video surveillance of the injured victim.
At what point in the claims process would the insurance company elect to make use of video surveillance?
Taped footage might be used during the adjuster’s assessment of the reported claim. During the investigation, taped footage could be used to illustrate the help those that would become responsible for identifying the responsible party.
If statements from the opposing sides were to display conflicting views, footage from a camera might help with learning the truth. That truth ought to emerge from footage of the scene that had been described in 2 different ways.
In what locations can video surveillance be carried out?
It would have to be used in a public setting.
—That setting could be a restaurant
—That setting could be a store or a park
—That setting could be in any open area, such as a bus or train stop.
A drone with a video camera could obtain footage from a series of different locations.
Would tape footage add a great deal of valuable information to the existing evidence?
In some states it could be more valuable than in others. Some states do not allow an audio aspect to any taped footage, unless the taped individual has consented to inclusion of the audio message.
Sometimes the facts stated in the videotape might be confirmed during a later interview with a neighbor or co-worker of the plaintiff or the defendant. Personal injury lawyers in Port Hope like to know when any video footage that is supposed to serve as evidence was taken.
How could the plaintiff’s lawyer fight any allegations that had been based on what could be seen in the video images?
A good lawyer would warn his/her client to share with a treating doctor or a neighbor any plans for attempting an activity that could not be performed earlier, due to the nature of the sustained injury.
An experienced attorney might place special emphasis on the need to inform the treating physician. That would help to ensure mention of the victim’s plans in the patient’s medical record. Documentation of the same plans could work to counter the effect of the images that the video camera had captured on tape.
Could footage of the plaintiff ever work to the plaintiff’s advantage?
It might, if it could show the plaintiff struggling to overcome a handicap, one that had been created by the effects of the accident-linked injury. Some lawyers even tape the daily struggles of their client, and show those same tapes to the jury, during a courtroom trial.
